Our Work / Research & Evidence
Selected findings from peer-reviewed research and a client evaluation, each stated with its own qualifiers and linked to the full summary.
Peer-reviewed case study
Of the 7 trainees (out of 26 who took the training) who returned an optional, anonymous post-training survey, all reported a satisfying or very satisfying experience, an average of 4.7 out of 5 (94%).
The authors describe the findings as preliminary, based on self-reported feedback from one company and a small, optional-response sample with no comparison or control group. Read the full summary.
Peer-reviewed controlled trial
In a quasi-experimental controlled trial of the same VR DEI program, offered to 1,149 eligible leaders, those who took the training showed, in the week after the class, statistically significant increases relative to a control group not yet trained in empathic feeling and expression (p = .002) and in upstander-behaviour predictors (p < .001).
Across the sample, the same measures remained significantly higher than baseline 6 to 8 months later, at which point there was no longer a control group for comparison. Read the full summary.
Program evaluation
Mater Education's own program evaluation of its "Speaking with Good Judgement: Through the Looking Glass" VR pilot found that 93% of participating staff enjoyed the experience and 90% reported an increase in their concentration.
Mater Education ran the pilot and wrote the closure report the figures come from. Read the full summary.
The Mayo Clinic trial included a control group and followed participants for 6 to 8 months. The Google figures came from seven people who chose to answer a survey.
"As organizations tighten budgets and adapt to remote workforces, VR offers scalability, efficiency, and deep behavioural impact. Beyond training technical skills, it enables leadership, resilience, de-escalation techniques, and inclusive decision-making, all essential for thriving in today's workplace."
Simon Lowe
CEO, People Tech Revolution. Forbes, 13 June 2025
Small samples and self-reported change are part of every finding on this page; each links to the study that states its own limits.
Want to talk through what this evidence means for your own program?
The three sources behind the figures on this page.

The source of the Google satisfaction figure above.

The source of the Mayo Clinic empathy and upstander-behaviour figures above.

The source of the Mater enjoyment and focus figures above.
Consultations, assessments and conversations from the same VR library each study drew on.
Our Work / Research & Evidence
Selected findings from peer-reviewed research and a client evaluation, each stated with its own qualifiers and linked to the full summary.
Peer-reviewed case study
Of the 7 trainees (out of 26 who took the training) who returned an optional, anonymous post-training survey, all reported a satisfying or very satisfying experience, an average of 4.7 out of 5 (94%).
The authors describe the findings as preliminary, based on self-reported feedback from one company and a small, optional-response sample with no comparison or control group. Read the full summary.
Peer-reviewed controlled trial
In a quasi-experimental controlled trial of the same VR DEI program, offered to 1,149 eligible leaders, those who took the training showed, in the week after the class, statistically significant increases relative to a control group not yet trained in empathic feeling and expression (p = .002) and in upstander-behaviour predictors (p < .001).
Across the sample, the same measures remained significantly higher than baseline 6 to 8 months later, at which point there was no longer a control group for comparison. Read the full summary.
Program evaluation
Mater Education's own program evaluation of its "Speaking with Good Judgement: Through the Looking Glass" VR pilot found that 93% of participating staff enjoyed the experience and 90% reported an increase in their concentration.
Mater Education ran the pilot and wrote the closure report the figures come from. Read the full summary.
The Mayo Clinic trial included a control group and followed participants for 6 to 8 months. The Google figures came from seven people who chose to answer a survey.
"As organizations tighten budgets and adapt to remote workforces, VR offers scalability, efficiency, and deep behavioural impact. Beyond training technical skills, it enables leadership, resilience, de-escalation techniques, and inclusive decision-making, all essential for thriving in today's workplace."
Simon Lowe
CEO, People Tech Revolution. Forbes, 13 June 2025
Small samples and self-reported change are part of every finding on this page; each links to the study that states its own limits.
Want to talk through what this evidence means for your own program?
The three sources behind the figures on this page.

The source of the Google satisfaction figure above.

The source of the Mayo Clinic empathy and upstander-behaviour figures above.

The source of the Mater enjoyment and focus figures above.
Consultations, assessments and conversations from the same VR library each study drew on.